Monday, February 24, 2014

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Denies TAC Appeal

Published on Thursday February 20 2014 (AEST 

Interesting article in reference to a freedom of information request by the Tallahassee Area Community



Travis E. Stills  IN RESPONSE REFER TO
Attorney for Tallahassee Area Community  FOIAIPA-2014-0007A
1911 Main Ave., Suite 238  (FOIA/PA-2014-0012)
Durango, CO 81301
Dear Mr. Stills:

On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am responding to your letter
received on December 23, 2013, in which you appealed the agency's November 21, 2013,
decision related to your client's October 15, 2013 Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act
(FOIA/PA) request (FOIA/PA - 2014 - 0012).  You appealed the denial of your client's request for a fee waiver. The NRC addresses fee waiver request under Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) 9.41, "Requests for Waiver or Reduction of Fees." This guidance implements the FOIA fee waiver standard (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(iii)).

In your appeal, you have argued that the requester does not have a commercial interest in obtaining the requested records. 

On its face, the Tallahassee Area Community (TAC) is, according to its website, an organization comprised of home owners who assert that uranium mining and exploration will dewater the area and devalue its property values. 

TAC asserts on its website that it "stands against the existence of an industrial mining operation in  (its) agricultural/forestry neighborhood."

Ostensibly, the records sought from the NRC in the present request, including documents regarding uranium processing technology, such as impact and laser ablation, will directly serve the commercial interests of the requester as described on their website.

However, it is not necessary to reach this conclusion for the reasons explained below.

Acting on your appeal (enclosed as Document 1), I have carefully reviewed the record in the case. I have determined that the NRC received your appeal after the timeframe within which the agency must receive an administrative appeal following a decision by the- agency denying a request for access to records.

1
A requester must submit an administrative appeal according to an agency's regulations, including regulations governing deadlines and procedures for submission.

2
Section 9.29(a) of 10 CFR states the following:

A requester may appeal a notice of denial of a Freedom of Information Act request for access to agency records, denial of a request for waiver or reduction of fees, or denial of a request for expedited processing under this Subpart within 30 calendar days of the date of the NRC's denial.

The NRC received your appeal on December 23, 2013. This was 32 days after the 110 CFR 9.29(a).

2 See, e.g., Imamoto v. SSA, No. 08-00137, 2008 WL 5179104, at 5 (D.  Haw. Dec. 9, 2008). T. Stills - 2 - November 21, 2013 response (enclosed as Document 2) that the NRC issued to administratively close your client's underlying request based on your client's failure to pay the fee estimate that the NRC issued to your client on November 5, 2013 (enclosed as Document 3).

Therefore, the NRC denies your appeal as untimely.



This is the NRC's final decision as to your appeal of the fee waiver denial. As set forth in the FOIA (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B)), judicial review of this decision is available in a district court of the United States in the district in which you reside or have your principal place of business. 
You can also obtain judicial review in the district in which the agency's records are situated or in the District of Columbia.

As part of the 2007 FOIA amendments, the Office of Government Information  Services (OGIS) was created to offer mediation services to resolve disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies as a nonexclusive alternative to litigation.  Using OGIS services does not affect your right to pursue litigation.  If you are requesting access to your own records (which is considered a Privacy Act request), you should know that OGIS does not have the authority to handle requests made under the Privacy Act of 1974. You may contact OGIS in any of the following ways:


Office of Government Information Services
National Archives and Records Administration Room 2510
8601 Adelphi Road
College Park, MD 20740-6001
E-mail: ocis(a.nara.,qov
Telephone: 301-837-1996
Facsimile: 301-837-0348
Toll-free telephone:  1-877-684-6448

Sincerely,
Darren B.. Ash
Deputy Executive Director for Corporate
Management and Chief Freedom of Information
Act Officer,
Office of the Executive Director for Operations.


Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Mineral Ablation Recovery Patent Details FEB 11 2014

Inventors: Coates; James A. (Casper, WY), Scriven; David H. (Casper, WY), Coates; Charles (Renton, WA), Coates; Eric (Casper, WY)
Applicant:
Name City State Country Type

Coates; James A.
Scriven; David H.
Coates; Charles
Coates; Eric

Casper
Casper
Renton
Casper

WY
WY
WA
WY

Posted Wednesday 19th February 2014 US
US
US
US
Assignee: Ablation Technologies, LLC (Casper, WY)
Family ID: 47879713
Appl. No.: 13/614,802
Filed: September 13, 2012



http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=8,646,705.PN.&OS=PN/8,646,705&RS=PN/8,646,705

Thursday, January 2, 2014

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) - Ablation Technology Meeting December 19 2013

E-mail from Sarah Fields Re NRC Dec. 19 Meeting with Mineral Ablation: Applicable Guidance.  


Copy of Email sent on Monday 12/16/2013 to the NRC

 

Monday, November 11, 2013

Black Range Minerals Acquires Shootaring Uranium Mill From UraniumOne


Published on Tuesday November 12 2013 (AEST) 
 
Permitted to process up to 750 tonnes of ore Per Day.
Capacity to process 1000 tonnes Per Day.


Black Range Minerals has agreed to buy the mothballed Shootaring Canyon uranium mill in Utah from Uranium One for $10 million.

The acquisition includes surface stockpiles of uranium ore, with a historic mineral resource estimate of some 250,000 pounds U3O8 (97 tU) at a grade of 0.13% U3O8. Black Range has also agreed to acquire Uranium One's other "conventional mining assets" within the USA, the most advanced being the previously mined Velvet-Wood deposit in Utah with remaining NI43-101 estimated resources of 5.3 million pounds of U3O8 (2039 tU).

 

Black Range already owns the Hansen/Taylor Ranch uranium project in Colorado. The company says that the cost of acquiring, refurbishing and restarting the Shootaring Canyon mill is expected to be "significantly less" than building a new processing facility at Hansen, and should enable it to fast-track the development of its Colorado project while avoiding costs from toll-milling at a third-party mill.

The company is expected to customise the mill so it can preferentially receive high-grade concentrates from multiple projects across the USA.



The purchase was described by Black Range as being "transformational," noting that "ownership of the Shootaring Mill, one of only three licenced mills in the USA, assures control of production all the way from mining to finished yellowcake."

The Shootaring Canyon mill, located approximately 77 kilometers south of Hanksville, Utah, is permitted to process up to 750 tonnes of ore per day, but has a capacity to process 1000 tonnes per day. The mill - the last conventional uranium mill to be built in the USA - was commissioned and operated for just four months in 1982, before being mothballed due to declining uranium prices. Black Range estimates it would take about 18 months to acquire the necessary permits to bring the mill back into action.

Uranium One acquired the Shootaring Canyon mill from US Energy Corp in April 2007.

 
__________________________________________________________
http://www.agapito.com/2010/04/velvet-mine-ventilation-analyses%E2%80%94moab-ut/___________________________________________________________

.
Click Image To Access Uranium Stocks Australia




.

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Black Range Minerals Water Monitoring & Water Rights Within Hansen Uranium Deposit Colorado

I just want to nip the current untruths in recent media reports from the TAC, whereby this organization are suggesting that no Water monitoring procedures has taken place within the confides of the Hansen Deposit I can confide this is 100% not correct, as no doubt all current researched BLR holders would or should already know !

 Monitoring wells with Hansen  

An orange case covers a monitoring well installed downstream from the Hansen uranium deposit to keep tabs on minerals in groundwater. Black Range Minerals installed numerous monitoring wells after acquiring the privately owned mineral rights to the Hansen and other nearby uranium deposits. 

Black Range Minerals are at this very moment in the process of installation of five new water monitoring wells immediately adjacent to the Project’s 39.4 million pound Hansen Uranium Deposit 

Pdf Link
ASX Release 2 October 2013DRILLING PROGRAM COMMENCES AT THE HANSEN URANIUM DEPOSIT 

 Baseline environmental data will be collected from all of these new wells and integrated with, and be complementary to, data from the Company's ongoing surface and ground-water monitoring programs 

In My Opinion Only*Word of caution is don't believe all the content that these Environmental activists circulate.. 



 Water Rights

“The North Spring Ditch water rights were changed in 1980, rendering any irrigation use since that date unusable for calculating historic consumptive use for a subsequent change of use.” Court documents show that the 1980 change of use involved the transfer of irrigation water rights from Taylor Ranch to Cyprus Mine, which changed the use of that water to mining. Alter said Cyprus Mines sold those water rights back to the Taylors in 1993, and in 2012 the Taylors filed a case in Division 2 Water Court, to “confirm” their rights.

Alter said TAC members believe the Taylors filed the case to determine how much water they can sell to Black Range Minerals for proposed mining operations, prompting TAC to enter the case as an objector.
Given: (1) the significance of historical consumptive use in determining the amount of water Black Range could acquire and
 

(2) the SWSP ruling rendering “irrigation use since (1980) unusable for calculating historic consumptive use,” Alter said he believes Black Range has insufficient water for mining for underground borehole mining. He cited estimates that the mining process could require as much as 50,000 gallons of water per hour.

http://coyotegulch.wordpress.com/2013/06/08/fremont-county-tallahassee-area-residents-are-now-1000-strong-in-opposition-to-black-ranges-uranium-operation/

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Black Range Minerals Management & Project Team

Over the past 7+ Years, Black Range Minerals have compiled one of the better qualified Uranium Project teams, that a speculative Uranium Explorer could endeavor to put together, and all in the good ole USA ! 

No High Risk African Connection ! 

Mike Haynes – Managing Director/CEO  
ex BHP Minerals Limited 

Ian Cunningham – Company Secretary  
ex Adamus Resources Limited 

Rod Grebb – VP Government and Regulatory Affairs  
ex 30 years experience in mine permitting with Tetra-Tech Inc and SRK in a senior consulting capacity specialising in mine permitting and regulatory matters for their clients. 

George Glasier – Consultant  
ex President and CEO of Energy Fuels Inc (TSX:EFR). During his time at Energy Fuels, George was responsible for building the company from scratch and leading the application process for licensing of the Pinon Ridge uranium mill planned for construction (still pending) in Colorado. Mr Glasier has over 40 years experience in the uranium industry in the USA, with extensive experience in sales and marketing, project development, and in permitting of uranium processing facilities.IMO: there's little doubt George Glasier will be the instrumental force in attaining Production at the Shootaring Uranium Mill to which BLR has recently attained rights to acquiring early 2014.  

Alexander Molyneux 
ex Chief Executive Officer &founder of SouthGobi Resources, until taken over by Rio Tinto.Also ex Managing Director, Head of Metals &Mining Investment Banking, Asia Pacific, with Citigroup. Has spent approximately 12 years providing advice and investment-banking services to mining, metals and industrial corporations.Currently Executive Chairman Celsius Coal Limited (ASX:CLA)Director International Resources Group (private)Chairman, Azarga Resources Limited (private)Director, Ivanhoe Energy Inc (TSX:IE, NASDAQ:IVAN)  

Ben Vallerine 
Serves as its Exploration Manager of USA. Mr. Vallerine has been leading Black Range Minerals' exploration and development activities for over 4 years. During this period he has developed an in depth understanding of its operations.Involved in a numerous resource projects, predominantly in Australia, Canada and the USA. He has worked for both junior and major mining companies, including Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited and Rio Tinto Limited 

Leon Pretorius Top 20 Holder 
And to top it all off we have ex Paladins Chief Geologist sitting on BLR's Top 20 Holders at #5 with 26.4 Million Shares. 
  


For the record As an Executive Director of Paladin Resources (now Paladin Energy), Dr Pretorius led Paladin through a growth phase that saw the stock price rise from less than $0.01 per share to more than $1.10 when he resigned in May 2005. He remains a Director of Paladin’s operating Company, Langer Heinrich Uranium in Namibia. 

 http://www.blackrangeminerals.com/content/corporate-governance/management/